The
European Commission's (EC) long-awaited plans to revise the Package
Travel Directive have been delayed again. A decision on whether
and how to proceed with these plans is not now expected until the
"late spring".
At
the end of January, chief executives of European travel companies met
the EU commissioner responsible for package travel policy, Viviane
Reding, to discuss their concerns about revising the directive.
Ms Reding also met consumer organisations at a separate meeting on
the same day.
The
Commission is now examining three main options: modernising the
current directive, leaving it as it is, or scrapping it entirely.
The idea of scrapping the directive (and not replacing it) is new,
and some consumer representatives have reacted with alarm to it.
The European Consumer Consultative Group (ECCG), a forum set up by
the EC to consult national and European consumer organisations, said:
"Scrapping
the directive would entail serious consequences for consumers,
including most probably a loss of consumer protection, increased
market fragmentation and unequal market conditions for consumers and
businesses.
It
would also lead to major uncertainty as to the fate of national laws
designed to implement the directive because the European legal base
would be lost and national law could develop in all directions."
ETOA’s
position is that the current legislation has been rendered obsolete
by new technologies and the advent of low-cost airlines. Consumer
protection now exists in a limited and non-explicit field. So the
Directive should be scrapped.
Scope of the Directive
Central
to the debate over the future of the directive has been the extent to
which dynamic packages should be brought within the scope.
There
are calls for the definition of "package" to be changed so
that it excludes "other tourism services". At
present, a "package" is defined as a combination of two or
more of the following elements: accommodation, transport and "other
tourist services not ancillary to transport or accommodation and
accounting for a significant proportion of the package".
The UK's Tourism Alliance is concerned that this last element catches
small domestic businesses, making it difficult for them to co-operate
locally in providing value-added products for their customers without
having to comply with the regulations. An example could be a hotel
offering golfing weekends in association with the local golf club.
Process
When
published, the new proposal will be considered by the European
Parliament and Council (member states). This could take several
months and the approval of both institutions will be needed for the
Directive to be adopted. Member states will then have two/three years
to implement the new measure in their national law.
Timing
Failure
to publish the proposed directive by the late spring could mean
further lengthy delays. Summer 2014 sees new elections to the
European Parliament and the appointment of a new college of European
Commissioners to take charge of the European Commission. The
legislative process effectively comes to a halt at such times.
Source: ETOA