ΔΙΕΘΝΗΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΗΛΕΚΤΡΟΝΙΚΗ ΕΦΗΜΕΡΙΔΑ ΠΟΙΚΙΛΗΣ ΥΛΗΣ - ΕΔΡΑ: ΑΘΗΝΑ

Ει βούλει καλώς ακούειν, μάθε καλώς λέγειν, μαθών δε καλώς λέγειν, πειρώ καλώς πράττειν, και ούτω καρπώση το καλώς ακούειν. (Επίκτητος)

(Αν θέλεις να σε επαινούν, μάθε πρώτα να λες καλά λόγια, και αφού μάθεις να λες καλά λόγια, να κάνεις καλές πράξεις, και τότε θα ακούς καλά λόγια για εσένα).

Παρασκευή 19 Μαΐου 2017

Passengers should pay for reclining their flight seats suggests study

Αποτέλεσμα εικόνας για Passengers should pay for reclining their flight seats suggests study

Reclining seats during a flight is one of the most disputable situations. It, in fact is a sure-fire move to make the person behind you feel disgusted, for apparently no wrong of yours.

Two American law professors have potentially come up with a solution, proposing a bargaining system whereby passengers would have to pay for the privilege of putting their seat back – or be paid to refrain from doing so.

Christopher Buccafusco and Christopher Jon Sprigman conducted a study to figure out how much people would be prepared to lay out to take advantage of their reclining capabilities. They charted a price for the same. On average, passengers would be willing to pay $12 (£9.20) to the passenger behind them to lean back. However, those sitting in the seat behind would demand far more, requiring $39 (£29.90) before they sacrificed their legroom.

The flip side of the story showed passengers would cough up $18 (£14) to stop the person in front reclining – while the person in front would require $41 (£31) to refrain from doing so.

Keeping the series of high profile incidents aboard aircraft, Buccafusco and Sprigman supported the concept of bargaining for certain privileges.

They wrote that seat recline space is efficiently allocated. Airlines are marginally further from bankruptcy. They also found out people responded better to the idea of swapping reclining privileges for a drink or snack during a flight, rather than dealing with money. This is for the fact that most passengers have some ethical resistance to the idea of making every human interaction into a money transaction.