Written by Justin
Burns
Development of
the ambitious Thames Estuary Airport (TEA) proposal could be achieved as early as
2027, the SMART Airports conference heard recently in Munich .
This was the
opinion of Huw Thomas, of Foster and Partners for the London Hub, who spoke
enthusiastically about his firm's vision for the massive plans, urging people
from all sectors of the UK community to think 'holistically' about the hub that
is needed to 'address the global markets'.
Costing for
just the airport and infrastructure he said would be about £24 billion and he
suggested an completion time of 2027, earlier than has previously been
mentioned.
Building a
four-runway TEA in the East of England is being proposed as a solution to
develop London's future hub needs and is seen by some including Mayor of
London, Boris Johnson, as the answer to solve the UK's airport expansion
headache.
"The best
location is somewhere that has the minimal impact on the people and to the East
of England seems to be right location. We need a next generation hub.
"We must
look at the bigger picture of global connectivity which is critical for people
and goods going forward," Thomas said.
The man who was
involved in designing the world's biggest building, Beijing Terminal 3, also enthused
about moving Heathrow, the UK 's
main airport.
The architect
says Heathrow would need to be closed if TEA was built, but hailed the
potential benefits to the UK
if a new London
borough was created in its place.
"Providing
a new borough is one opportunity with TEA, especially with London forecasted to grow by two million
people in the near future.
"And you
would have to demolish less homes with TEA than to build a third runway at
Heathrow,'" Thomas said.
Some
commentators have previously declared that the UK
could not deliver such a huge project by moving London 's hub from Heathrow and building a
state-of-the-art facility in its place at a completely new location.
Thomas
described this as 'nonsense' and says the UK
can deliver, pointing to his own firm's involvement in the massive relocation
project of Hong Kong
International Airport ,
which was achieved totally by the British.
"This is
nonsense as we experienced first hand moving an airport in Hong
Kong , and we delivered that and the British were behind that.
"And if
you move one airport's employment it is not such a big task if you have the
time to do it," he says.
Environment
campaigners are strongly opposed to TEA as they think it would mean birds who
migrate to the estuary would lose their habitat as a 20km stretch from the
estuary would be lost with flights taking this route.
But Thomas told
delegates any developer wishing to construct it would have to have a bird
protection scheme in place when constructing.
Another major
concern for many is the potential huge cost of TEA, with commentators
questioning how this would be raised in the continued tough economic climate
and plans in Europe to prevent airports from
receiving state aid from their governments for infrastructure and airport
projects.
Some have
forecasted the total cost of the project from everything connected with moving
Heathrow, transport projects and the airport itself at around £50 billion, but
others have said it would cost nearer to £100 billion.
Thomas said it
could a totally funded through private enterprises and once Heathrow reaches a
capacity of 84mppa, TEA could be opened with 84mppa, and up to 110mppawithin 10
years – with expansion eventually capable of receiving 150mppa and one day
180mppa if plans were already secured for a fifth runway.
"And we
forecast you can pay back the total cost of TEA 10 years after the opening.
"TEA would
give London and the UK
and Europe an advantage by creating a facility that can go head-to-head with Istanbul and other
emerging airports around the world over the next 20 years, " Thomas
concluded.
The London hub is the busiest
in the world and Heathrow now only has 1.5% capacity expansion space and a
third runway is being proposed to increase capacity.
The Davies
Commission set up by the government, is reviewing the UK 's aviation
capacity and is due to publish an interim report by the end of the year.
A final report
recommending whether or not a new airport should be built is set to be
published after the next election in 2015.
Source:airport-world.com